Optimized grading: your results come back faster
Results now come back noticeably faster after you end a scenario by implementing a new faster, optimized grading system
Nothing about scoring behavior changed and has been kept intact.
Changelog
Every release that changes how you train. The same notes pop up in the app when something new lands.
Results now come back noticeably faster after you end a scenario by implementing a new faster, optimized grading system
Nothing about scoring behavior changed and has been kept intact.
When a reply lands well, or does not land at all, you can now say so on the spot.
Hover over any patient or training officer message, during the scenario or in the transcript afterward, and a thumbs up and a thumbs down appear just underneath it. On a phone or tablet they are always visible. One tap is all it takes.
Either rating then opens an optional box for a sentence about it. On a thumbs up we ask what worked, so we know which replies are worth keeping. On a thumbs down we ask what was off, whether that is a response that did not fit the patient, a detail that contradicted the scene, or anything that broke the realism. Leaving a note is entirely optional, and the rating on its own is already useful.
Changed your mind? Tap the same thumb again to undo it, or tap the other one to switch.
Every rating goes straight to the team and helps us tune how patients and training officers respond.
Announcing a report and giving one are different things, and the simulator used to treat them the same. If you typed “give my report”, it answered “Report received” and moved on. You never actually delivered the report, and your grade reflected that.
Now your preceptor prompts you for it. You’ll be asked to give your verbal handoff report, and you can radio it ahead while you’re en route or deliver it to the receiving staff when you arrive.
Once you give the report with the patient details in it, the handoff is acknowledged the way it always was. If you were already delivering full reports, nothing changes for you.
This was the step students disputed more than any other, and the disputes were right. You would ask what happened, get told, and still lose the point because you hadn’t said it back.
The skill sheet asks you to determine the mechanism of injury or nature of illness. It doesn’t ask you to recite it. So it now credits the ways you actually establish it: asking for it outright, asking a bystander what happened, running it as part of your size-up list, calling the encounter one or the other, and the usual abbreviations typed under time pressure.
One thing deliberately unchanged: handing the decision back to your examiner isn’t determining it. Asking which of the two it is, or offering them a choice, still doesn’t count. Asking what it is does.
If you study on any track other than EMT, the free sample scenarios never showed up for you: not on the Scenarios page, not on your home screen. That was a bug on our side, and it had been there since those tracks launched.
Every track now has its own three: AEMT, Paramedic, CNA, LPN, RN, CCRN, CEN, RRT, and both FNP boards. They’re the real thing, with a full AI patient and a full graded debrief at the end, matched to your scope of practice.
Thanks to those of you who wrote in about not finding anything free to try. That’s what surfaced it.
If you said you were taking the patient in and still lost the transport point, that was on us, and several of you told us so. You were right.
It was matching too narrowly on the exact words used. It now recognizes the way the call actually sounds, including radio-style phrasing, priority-and-destination wording, and the usual slips typed under time pressure.
One thing deliberately unchanged: asking whether to transport isn’t a decision. Committing to one is the skill being tested. Asking the patient whether they’d like to go doesn’t count either.
Thanks to everyone who flagged this on their score sheet. That feedback is what found it.
Answer choices are now shuffled, so position never gives the answer away.
This affected the Paramedic, LPN, RN, and RRT banks, where the correct choice was landing first far more often than it should have. The EMT, AEMT, CNA, CCRN, CEN, and FNP banks were already varied and are unchanged.
The order stays the same on reload and in review, so the letters you picked still match the explanations.
Deciding whether you need more help is one point on the scene size-up, and it was too fussy about the exact words you used.
It now credits the way students actually talk:
One thing hasn’t changed, because it’s what the skill sheet is testing: asking your training officer whether you need help (“do I need ALS?”) isn’t a decision. Make the call in your own words and it counts.
If you train at the AEMT or Paramedic level, grading could occasionally judge you as though you were an EMT, and fail you for doing your job correctly.
Two fixes:
The major-bleeding line was the most-questioned item on the score sheet, and almost every question was the same one: “I asked about life threats; doesn't that include bleeding?”
It's a fair question, and the answer is worth knowing for your exam:
If you typed something brief and correct, such as a transport priority, an A&O reading, or a chief complaint, the scenario would occasionally come back with a notice asking you to rephrase, even though nothing was wrong with what you said.
Two things changed:
If you do still hit it, retrying is safe: nothing you already did is lost.
Your drug box just got deeper, and your patients notice.
Ask for what you want the way you would on a real call: name the drug, the dose, and the route.
Previously, transferring care to an arriving ALS crew ended the scenario on the spot, even if you weren't quite done.
Now the handoff wraps up the encounter narratively, and you choose when to finish: click End Scenario when you're ready to submit for your results. Nothing else about grading changed: your handoff report is graded exactly as before.
Some of you, especially on iPhone or when opening Medceptor from a link inside another app, would occasionally see a "Sign-in didn't finish" message after choosing your Google account.
That's fixed: sign-in now recovers on its own. You may briefly see your Google account picker a second time. Pick your account and you're in. If anything still gets in the way, you'll see clear guidance instead of a dead end.
You can now change your study track whenever you like, without contacting support.
Head to Settings → General → Study track, pick your new track, and the scenarios, question bank, and practice exams switch over instantly.
Your progress is saved per track: if you switch back later, you'll pick up right where you left off.
Studying for an EMS cert? Tutorial mode lets you run a scenario with a coach at your side, giving you reps without the exam pressure:
Look for Start tutorial on any scenario, or the new Tutorial tab in the sidebar.
Family Nurse Practitioner prep is here. When you sign up, you can now choose the board you're studying for:
Each comes with a board-aligned question bank, practice patient encounters that coach you through the full primary-care workflow (assess, diagnose, plan, and treat across the lifespan), and a timed practice exam with a readiness estimate. Your study mentor is there throughout to help you reason it out.
Respiratory therapy prep is here. When you sign up, you can now choose a respiratory-therapy track:
Both come with a question bank built for the NBRC Therapist Multiple-Choice (TMC) written exam: a full explanation on every answer, a study mentor to help you reason through ABGs, ventilator settings, and oxygen titration, and a timed practice exam with a readiness estimate.
The RRT track adds clinical-simulation practice: realistic patient encounters modeled on the NBRC Clinical Simulation Examination (CSE), scored decision by decision with an estimated-readiness result. (The CRT track preps the written exam only.)
The AEMT track now has a much broader library of scored patient simulations (cardiac, respiratory, neurologic, OB/GYN, pediatric, toxicology, and more), each one run start to finish and graded against the AEMT skill sheet.
We put a lot of work into making scenarios feel like a real call:
A big round of grading accuracy work:
We've opened up new study tracks. When you sign up, you can now pick the certification you're studying for:
Each track comes with its own question bank and practice tailored to that certification, and several include a full practice exam. Pick the one you're studying for and everything (questions, scenarios, and scoring) is scoped to your cert.
If you're studying for the NCLEX-PN or NCLEX-RN, the practice exam now behaves like the real test:
Real nursing isn't just what you do; it's what you chart. In LPN and RN simulations you can now open a charting panel and document the encounter as it unfolds:
Drilling questions on one of the new tracks? A study mentor is one tap away, right on the question page:
Paramedic scenarios now hand you the diagnostics instead of narrating them:
When you review a question after submitting, the correct answer is now shown in full text instead of only a letter.
For Build a List ordering questions, the answer dropdowns and the correct-order summary show the full text of every choice, so it's clear which answer belongs in each position.
Some calls, like an emergency childbirth or a behavioral-crisis scenario, don't map to an NREMT patient-assessment scoring sheet, so grading them that way wasn't fair to a great run.
You can now speak instead of type. A microphone button sits right next to Send anywhere you chat with Medceptor, in patient scenarios and with your study assistant.
We've tidied up the experience across medceptor.com:
The new medceptor.com shows the product instead of describing it: a real graded attempt replays right on the homepage, with dispatch, patient dialogue, vitals, and the skill sheet checking off in real time.
Also new:
Every rubric item in your grade report now carries a structured debrief:
The goal: you should never see a score and wonder why.
Your practice history now lives in one place:
You can now switch Medceptor to a dark theme, easier on the eyes for late-night studying. Set it yourself, or let it follow your device's system setting.
Signing in now drops you onto a home screen built around your progress:
Medceptor now has clear, transparent plans:
Beyond scenarios, you can now drill the fundamentals:
Stuck on a concept? The new Preceptor Bot is a study assistant built right into Medceptor. Ask it EMS questions in plain language and get a clear answer to keep you moving.
The scenario library has grown to 100+ patient scenarios spanning many emergency types: medical and trauma, routine and complex.
Search and filter to train exactly the kind of call you want to practice.
Medceptor now covers trauma as well as medical calls. Run a full trauma patient assessment with a simulated patient and get scored against the official trauma skill sheet, with the same instant, decision-by-decision feedback you get on every scenario.
You can now create a Medceptor account, signing up with email or with Google, so your scenarios, scores, and progress are saved and ready wherever you sign in.
Medceptor just took a big leap: live, conversational patient simulations.
Step into a realistic EMS call, talk to a simulated patient, work with your training officer, and make real clinical decisions as the scenario unfolds.
When you're done, every decision is scored against the official NREMT skill sheet, with an instant debrief so you know exactly what to sharpen next time.
We added a library of EMT study guides covering the topics that trip people up most (patient assessment, medications, OPQRST and SAMPLE histories, and more), all written and reviewed by certified EMS educators.
Medceptor started with a simple goal: help EMT students walk into their exam ready.
The first version brought practice questions online so you could study anywhere, the foundation everything since has been built on.